Accompanied by The Yellow River Cantata’s melody, a group of people shouted "year-end award, year-end award, we are howling, we are howling", while shaking their heads and pretending to be crazy, sometimes with their eyes wide open, and sometimes with their hips twisted and their arms dancing wildly … … Recently, a "year-end award" version of The Yellow River Cantata video was circulated on the Internet.Vulgar lyrics and exaggerated performances, most viewers not only didn’t laugh after watching them, but even wanted to "roar": "How can we spoil our classic songs like this!"

　　The spoof performance can often be seen in life. It is good to amuse others, but the form and content of the performance itself are not without a bottom line.To entertain the audience in the form of spoofing classic works is neither inheriting classics nor artistic re-creation.Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi mentioned the problem of "grandstanding" 2000 years ago, pandering to the audience with grandiose words and deeds, so as to cheat the trust and support, which is a kind of deception to the audience. Life really needs to make people laugh and laugh, but whether a performance can achieve the effect of making people laugh depends on real skill and level. An old artist reminded me that "the lyrics are the easiest to write, and the lyrics are the hardest to write well".Entertainment has the bottom line of entertainment, seriousness is necessary, poking fun at classic works and fooling the seriousness of history, which not only oversteps the boundaries of entertainment but also desecrates the sanctity of art, and can’t convey knowing laughter at all.

　　Spoof "Yellow River Chorus"》

　　The reason why spoofing classic works is very harmful is not only because the deconstruction of spoofing itself is very negative, but also because the destructive power of "collective unconsciousness" cannot be underestimated.Admittedly, spoofing may arouse some cheap laughter during the performance. It is precisely because it is easy to deconstruct and spoof classics and the laughter won is very cheap, so the performance form is easy to be imitated by more people. Some reporters found that the spoof of The Yellow River Cantata not only appeared openly at the annual meetings of some companies, but also appeared at the parties of kindergartens, middle schools, universities and other educational institutions, and even appeared on TV screens. Laughing and laughing seems insignificant, but what is spread in cheap laughter is not the spirit of entertainment or the atmosphere of laughter, but the increasingly nihility of value and the increasingly ruined morality. To spoof and tamper with classic works with no so-called attitude will tear up the moral bottom line and value recognition that should be adhered to and defended in boiling frogs in warm water, thus lowering people’s aesthetic taste and confusing normal social cognition. From this, it is everyone’s responsibility to resist spoofing and deconstruction.

　　History is not an "empty bag" that can hold everything. It is also a literary work that carries historical memories and national feelings. It is also not an "empty bag" that can hold everything and a "draft paper" that can be changed as you want. What The Yellow River Cantata sang was the Eighth Route Army’s firm determination to cross the Yellow River eastward and drink horses to fight against the Japanese aggressors, and the unyielding spirit of awakening the whole nation and fighting the Japanese aggressors to the end. It is no exaggeration to say that it is the "soul of the nation" and "immortal work".Tampering with this masterpiece, which reflects the voice of national salvation for the sake of humor, is obviously a blasphemy against history and a waste of national spirit. What is the difference between it and the muddleheaded "birds among the tents"?Soldiers often say that in peacetime, it is especially necessary to be alert to "peaceful habits." For each of us, it is also necessary to keep alert to peaceful habits such as historical indifference and nihilism.

　　"People who don’t know their history before birth will always be children." It is the minimum requirement to treat the history written by our ancestors with warmth and respect. History not only has the struggles of our ancestors, but also maintains the past and future of our generation; Classic works carry not only the peak of artistic creation, but also the rise and fall and honor and disgrace of the nation. Respecting history and classics is actually respecting yourself and the future.

　　The "6.20" major traffic accident case in Nanjing, which has attracted much attention, has made new progress. At 9: 20 tonight, @ Nanjing Traffic Police explained the top ten doubts that people are most concerned about in the "6.20" case. Among them, the police explained that the speed of the BMW car, which the public is most concerned about, was very fast at the time of the accident, but the specific value needs further identification.

　　1. How can the police determine that the arrested suspected man is the perpetrator?

　　The police extracted the blood on the airbag of the BMW car that caused the accident at the scene, and compared it with the blood sample of the suspected man captured by the police for DNA, and found it to be the same. Witnesses at the scene identified the arrested man as the suspect. In addition, the suspect Wang Jijin was hit by a vehicle airbag in the chest and strangled by a seat belt, so it was determined that Wang Jijin was the driver of the BMW.

　　2. How does the police rule out the suspicion that the suspect was driving under the influence of drugs? According to eyewitnesses, there was white powder at the scene of the incident. Did the police confirm it as a drug?

　　According to the police investigation, the suspect Wang Jijin had no drug abuse record. After the incident, he was tested for urine, and the result was negative, confirming that he was suspected of driving without drugs. During the on-site investigation, the police found that there was a bag of white powder on the ground about 30 meters away from the BMW. After being extracted and tested by the police, the white powder was starch, which ruled out the possibility of drugs.

　　3. How does the police rule out the suspicion of drunk driving?

　　After the incident, the police took the blood sample of the suspect for inspection, and the identification result of the blood sample for inspection was: no ethanol component was detected in the blood sample of the suspect Wang Jijin.

　　4. It is understood that the BMW involved in the accident is a seizure car. Can the car be driven on the road, modified or insured?

　　After investigation, the license plate number of the BMW is Shaanxi AH8N88, the vehicle registration place is dmv, the traffic police detachment of Xi ‘an Public Security Bureau, and the owner is Xu Moumou. The initial registration date is March 13, 2014, and the inspection period is March 31, 2016. At the end of 2014, the car was seized by Xi ‘an Public Security Bureau according to law. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the vehicle shall not be changed or transferred during the seizure period, but it does not affect the use of the vehicle. Appraised by the police, the car is a BMW "730" sedan, only the logo has been changed to the BMW "740" logo, and its appearance and technical parameters are consistent with the vehicle registration data. The car is insured with Pacific Insurance Company for compulsory insurance and third party liability insurance, and the insurance is valid from January 14, 2015 to January 13, 2016.

　　5. Is the BMW owned by the suspect and the source of the vehicle?

　　The registered owner of Shaanxi AH8N88 BMW is Xu Moumou, and the actual user is Wang Jijin. After investigation, due to debt disputes, the owner of the car changed hands several times to pay off debts. Later, Wang Jijin bought and used it privately at the price of 400,000 yuan in early 2015, but did not go through the relevant transfer procedures. At present, the police are investigating the multiple transactions of the car.

　　6. Is the driver’s license of the suspect in the accident within the validity period?

　　After investigation, Wang Jijin’s quasi-driving model is A2, and the driving license is valid from March 16, 2011 to March 16, 2021, with a validity period of 10 years.

　　7. Is the suspect a rich second generation or an official second generation?

　　After investigation, the suspect Wang Jijin (male, 35 years old, from Jingjiang, Jiangsu) temporarily lives in Jiangning District, Nanjing, and his parents are currently working in Jingjiang’s hometown. His father worked in Nanjing in 1992, and then operated the sales business of hydropower materials in a decorative city. In 2006, due to physical reasons, he handed over the shop to his son Wang Jijin. His mother has no job.

　　8. Why was the suspect wearing a helmet and restrained when he was examined by the police station?

　　The suspect Wang Jijin was very excited after being arrested and taken to the police station. He shouted loudly, hit his head against the wall and tried to bite the police and secret service personnel. For safety reasons, the police put on a helmet for the suspect Wang Jijin, handcuffed his hands behind his back and controlled his legs with restraint belts.

　　9. What is the speed of BMW? Is it speeding?

　　According to the video and eyewitness reports, the instantaneous speed of Shaanxi AH8N88 BMW was very fast when the accident happened, but the specific value needs further identification.

　　10. What channels do the police currently release authoritative information?

　　By 21: 00 on June 23rd, the police had issued three circulars (including this one) through Weibo, the official of the Traffic Management Bureau, and had not released news through other channels before.

　(Reporter Luo Peng)